Smaller variance in nutrition accountability
I love the added ability to change the “variance” for nutrition accountability. However, it seems the steps in variance are quite large. From 10% up to as much as 100% in 10% increments. Just a suggestion, I feel as though 5% up to 50% variance with 5% increments would be more applicable. Just my thoughts/ feedback.
Shayla Rog commented
Yes, having smaller options for variance is much needed. I have some clients (bodybuilding competitors) who need to be spot on almost daily - 0% variance.
While I wouldn't use this strict of an approach for a lifestyle client, having smaller % is also necessary because as calories increase, even 10% can become a pretty large variance.
10% for a client who is only eating 1500 kcal is only 150 kcal either way. Not a huge deal.
10% for a client who is eating 3200 kcal is 320 kcal either way. If this happened daily, that is 2240 kcal over the course of a week.