Rob
My feedback
21 results found
-
999 votesplanned · 58 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →Rob supported this idea ·
-
397 votes67 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Rob commentedI would really lie to have this as well. I have a couple design templates in which I direct reps @ a %RM> I currently have to use my hard copy sheet and review each and every client past progress to accomplish this == VERY time intensive jumping across several screens (in fact much more time intensive than my hard copy files for in person clients.)
With this I can see where it is a small step to get %RM assignments into the periodization / planning process - such as when one is using Wendler's 5-3-1 programming, or a Westside BB conjugate approach, etc.
Rob supported this idea · -
52 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
1,605 votes
Hi everyone,
Thanks for coming to the idea forum and adding your vote to this idea.
We’re moving this to our planned roadmap.Please come back to ideas.trainerize.com to add your vote to other ideas.
Thanks!Rob supported this idea · -
8 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
1,020 votes26 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →Rob supported this idea ·
-
24 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob commentedIn this latest update I have discovered that I can accomplish this via the schedule feature which is part of the periodization process now. Awesome.
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob commentedYES! I am in the precise same predicament.
Rob supported this idea · -
363 votes42 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob commentedJust realized the power in this request when I started using this for studio members in addition to remote / on the go clients. We train up to 3 at a time.... Would not prefer to have to have 3 ipads
Rob supported this idea · -
52 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
1,396 votes61 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →Rob supported this idea ·
-
7,335 votesunder review · 138 comments · Client / Gym Members - ABC Trainerize » Exercises, Workouts and Programs · Admin →Rob supported this idea ·
-
741 votes97 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →
Hi everyone,
Thanks for your great suggestion! We've added this to our work queue. We'll post further updates here as our teams pick it up to work on it. Please come back to ideas.trainerize.com to add your vote to other ideas.
Thanks!
Rob supported this idea · -
210 votes13 comments · Coach / Trainer - ABC Trainerize » Exercise, Workouts and Programs Exercises · Admin →Rob supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rob commentedI would like to be able to view a group of clients progress that day or week at one time. It is unbelievably time consuming to oversee a group of 18 clients doing a group fitness challenge as they enter their numbers each day.
-
25 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
16 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
172 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
12 votesRob supported this idea ·
-
12 votesRob supported this idea ·
Presently the app calculates a 1RM and 80% RM load based on the first set and # reps of a move. This info is available in the movement detail screen on smart phones. It really isn't usable like this. No one hits a lift like that on their first set...
For example; I am currently doing Wendler's 5-3-1 process and it calcs my 1RM off the first set [which is 5R@70%, or 3R@75%] for which I am exceeding that lift on the very next set! And even if I was using another protocol, at a 4 to 6 rep set, I would be hitting a couple warm-up sets first (and yes I want to record those also).
It may be a small thing to many, but it is a large inconsistency when working with people remotely, so can we get this corrected so it is accurate?