In the nutrition goal, having the ability to adjust each nutrients' variance independently instead of generally is really important. Ideally you would have a variance level for each nutrient: calories, proteins, fats, & carbs. Clients who are doing fantastic at their nutrition (increasing protein, decreasing calories etc... At this point the software says you don't hit the nutritional goal if you're way over on protein, way under on carbs or fats, and even calories. Sometimes those days happen, and i wouldn't consider them as not meeting their nutritional goal.

That's important if i'm trying to check someones weekly nutrition adherence. It also extends into the new challenges feature, where maximal nutritional adherence is penalized because the variance of each nutrient is so generally dispersed.

When you factor in nutrient science, nutritional psychology, and how to coach people into success having general variance in the nutrition goals doesn't make sense.